Wizards in D&D Basic are Evokers, one of multiple
schools of magic, the rest of which will be in the full game. The evoker is a
damage dealer, so it’s a good way to see how the spell combat versatility of
the wizard stacks up to the cleaving might of the champion fighter.
The Beginning: I offer up Tarvena Ozandras, a human (for
ease of comparison) wizard at level 1. Like Davin the fighter I’m making
Tarvena using the point-buy method, but I’m going to play her to wizard
strength’s exclusively, which means great INT and WIS.
Tarvena Ozandras
Race: Human
female Class: Wizard Level : 1
Alignment: chaotic good Background: Sage
(discredited academic)
STR 11 (+0);
DEX 12 (+1); CON 10 (0); INT 16 (+3); WIS 16 (+3); CHA 12 (+1)
HD D6; HPs 6;
Saves INT, WIS; Proficiency +2; AC 11
Languages: Middle Tongue (common), Elvish
Skills: Arcana, History, Religion,
Investigation
Tool Proficiencies: none
Wizard Traits:
Spellcasting (ritual casting, Save DC
13; Spell Attack Modifier +5)
Spell Slots: 1st level: 3
Arcane Recovery (regain 1 spell slot =
to ½ level rounded up once between rests)
Three Cantrips: light, mage hand,
shocking grasp
1st Level Spells (2 slots): burning hands, charm person, comprehend
languages, detect magic, shield, sleep
Sage Feature: Researcher
Armor: a
comfy cloak
Melee Weapons: Quarterstaff (+2 attack;
1D6 bludgeoning; versatile 1D8)
Equipment: one component pouch, scholar’s
pack, spellbook, black ink, quill,
small knife, letter from a dead colleague, clothes, belt pouch, 10 GP
small knife, letter from a dead colleague, clothes, belt pouch, 10 GP
Trinket: a set of bone pipes
Personality Trait: Convinced people are
always trying to steal my secrets
Ideal: No Limits
Bond: Sold soul for knowledge, seek to
regain it through great deeds
Flaw: unlocking an ancient mystery is
worth the price of a civilization
Tarvena at level 1 |
Tarvena
Ozandras is ready for adventuring now. After many years of exciting debacles,
turmoil and trouble she reaches level 20. While she likely would have acquired
a variety of magic items, since we’re still lacking detailed rules for them her
new assessment will stand on its own, with learned class magic only. Here then
is Tarvena at level 20:
Tarvena Ozandras
Race: Human
female Class: Wizard Level : 1
Alignment: chaotic good Background: Sage
(discredited academic)
STR 11 (+0); DEX 14 (+2); CON 10 (0);
INT 20 (+5/+11 saves); WIS 20 (+5/+11 saves); CHA 12 (+1)
HD 20D6; HPs 74; Saves INT, WIS; Proficiency +6; AC 12
Languages: Middle Tongue (common), Elvish
Skills: Arcana, History, Religion,
Investigation
Tool Proficiencies: none
Wizard Traits:
Spellcasting (ritual casting, Save DC 19;
Spell Attack Modifier +11)
Arcane Recovery (regain 1 spell slot =
to ½ level rounded up once between rests)
Spell Mastery (declare one 1st
and one 2nd level spell to be at-will after 8 hours of study)
Arcane Tradition – Evocation:
Evocation Spell (cost in gold and time
for evocation spell transcription is ½)
Sculpt Spells (allow 1+spell level
targets in spell effect to make saves/take no damage)
Potent Cantrip (cantrip attacks that
miss still deal ½ damage)
Empowered Evocation (add INT mod (+5)
to evocation spell damage)
Overchannel (deal max damage with spell
of 5th level or less; if done a 2nd time take 2D12
necrotic damage for each level of spell if you cast it a 2nd and
this goes up 1D12 per level for 3rd time, etc.)
Five Cantrips: light, mage hand,
shocking grasp, prestidigitation, fire bolt
1st Level Spells (4 slots): burning hands, charm person, comprehend
languages, detect magic, shield, sleep, magic armor, magic missile
2nd Level Spells (3 slots): blur, hold person, invisibility, magic weapon,
spider climb, suggestion
3rd Level Spells (3 slots):
fireball, dispel magic, haste, fly, major image
4th Level Spells (3 slots):
arcane eye, dimension door, greater invisibility, stoneskin
5th Level Spells (3 slots):
dominate person, dream, cone of cold, passwall
6th Level Spells (2 slots): disintegrate,
globe of invulnerability, mass suggestion, true seeing
7th Level Spells (2 slots):
delayed blast fireball, finger of death, modenkainen’s sword, teleport
8th Level Spells (1 slot):
dominate monster, maze, power word stun, sunburst
9th Level Spells (1 slot):
foresight, imprisonment, meteor swarm, power word kill, time stop
Sage Feature: Researcher
Armor: a
comfy cloak, or mage armor when cast (AC 15 for 8 hours)
Melee Weapons: Quarterstaff (+2 attack;
1D6 bludgeoning; versatile 1D8) – can power it up to be a +3 enchanted weapon
for up to 1 hour with Magic Weapon using a 6th level slot
Equipment: one component pouch, scholar’s
pack, spellbook, black ink, quill,
small knife, letter from a dead colleague, clothes, belt pouch, 10 GP
small knife, letter from a dead colleague, clothes, belt pouch, 10 GP
Trinket: a set of bone pipes
Personality Trait: Convinced people are
always trying to steal my secrets
Ideal: No Limits
Bond: Sold soul for knowledge, seek to
regain it through great deeds
Flaw: unlocking an ancient mystery is
worth the price of a civilization
Tarvena at Level 20 |
Pretty nice….and
also eerily similar to the way a 2nd edition spellcaster might look
(or 3rd edition, too, but with fewer slots). I’ve not made any decisions about what spells
Tarvena would have encountered in the wilds, but you can safely assume she
might know all of the spells in the Basic rules….these spells above are what
she learned from her own leveling experience, though.
In combat,
Tarvena’s deadliest spell against a single target is disintegration, which can
deal an average of 75 points against a foe which fails its saving roll. To look
at Davin Kormak the level 20 warrior as an example, that means he needs to beat
Tarvena’s DC of 19. He’s got a Dex save
of +5, so he’ll succeed 35% of the time. Even if he fails, he can take two or
possibly three disintegration blasts to the face before he keels over. In the
same amount of time…..assuming Tarvena is not flying….he should be able to take
her out in one or two rounds with a little luck, maybe three rounds if he’s
firing a long bow to pick her off at a distance. Tarvena, for the record, can
cast disintegration up to 6 times: twice at normal damage, twice with +3D6
damage for a level 7 slot, two more times for +6D6 damage using a level 8 slot,
and finally once at level 9 for an additional +9D6 damage. Yowza!!!!
So does this
make Tarvena an impossible foe? Since wizards can only keep one active
concentration effect going at a time she could be invisible and attacking with
disintegration….but that exposes her after the first spell. Flying is a better
bet, especially if you know your foe can’t reach you. Or, just forget
disintegration for a moment and slam something with meteor swarm, dealing and
average of 145 points of damage….then polish him off with one well-placed
disintegration shot if he doesn’t reach you first. In our prior example,
assuming Tarvena is flying when she unleashes a meteor attack on the first shot,
even if Davin is using a long bow (and not a crossbow) to strike back he can
pop his action surge and fire eight arrow attacks at her. If he hits, he will
deal 1D8+4 per attack, and since his chance of hitting her with Mage Armor
active (it doesn’t require concentration) and assuming she also pops a shield
as a reaction, then he hits her 55% of the time. With 8 arrows that means he
hits her roughly 4 times for 36 points of damage.
Can the level
20 fighter have any hope of defeating the level 20 wizard at this stage? Circumstances will likely suggest it’s
possible, but only because there’s a very important element missing from these
hypothetical examples: the actual game story elements that are going on. In a
spherical cow scenario as I am presenting here we are assuming the wizard has
come in with flight and mage armor on, ready to bombard the fighter into
oblivion. Fair enough, right? He’s walking along out in the open, minding his
own business when….bam, wizard has him on the defensive and not enough arrows
in the world can take her down.
The smart
fighter, of course, may be traveling to avoid an ambush. He may be planning to
kill the wizard….if he gets even one round’s initiative on her, and catches her
in melee range when he does then she’s got a decent chance of dying on the
spot. If the fighter knows he’s going to fight a wizard then he might come a
bit better prepared, too….but this could be construed as cheating, if we assume
the fighter needs some gear or allies to back him against the wizard, no?
So....what do you think? If we're assuming class balance is a requirement, is the fighter hosed? The scenario I'm proposing above is frankly a fairer fight than anything the fighter might have gotten in 3rd or 2nd edition.....and while it might have been a fair fight in 4E it frankly would have been rather boring watching the two trade blows for a few hours to get to the conclusion (I say this with unpleasant experience backing my contention).
Here's my take: the fighter is actually a "hard mode" class. It's what you play when you know the odds aren't always in your favor because you're the guy who kills the wizards that summon bad stuff and make life miserable for everyone else. You have a combat advantage, yes....but to counter the magic the wizard brings to the table you also need brains to go with the brawn, tactics and strategies that take advantage of your foe.
Conan never stood out in the open while a flying mage armored wizard hosed him down with meteor fire, is what I'm saying......he would run for cover and get the hell out of sight, then wait until the wizard's back was turned and hit that sucker for all his might! That's why the fighter is a more rewarding class....it's the Blood and Guts level of play.
Keep in mind too that Conan sought the assistance of other sorcerers when necessary to take down his sorcerous foes - for example in "The Scarlet Citadel", "People of the Black Circle", and of course the magnificent "Hour of the Dragon". Conan wasn't thrilled at the prospect, but he didn't stubbornly insist on making it a pure contest of steel vs. spells. It would be perfectly reasonable for a D&D fighter to get such aid as well, which could more than level the playing field.
ReplyDeleteVery true. The idea of Conan as being afraid of magic was mostly an artifact of the comics from the 70's which liked to play that up to amusing levels.
DeleteA real problem with comparing a PC vs. PC fight like this is it misses the real point of balance: PC vs. whatever the DM throws at them. And a good DM will keep in mind the wizard and fighter when working out scenarios, to make sure that they both have some versatility. DMs who want everything equalized so you don't have to think about it probably should play different games or not bother with DMing, in my opinion.
On another note, your statement that a failed save against disintegration doesn't kill you on the spot is pretty depressing. It's DISINTEGRATION for Pete's sake - if you fail your save you should be DUST! It just goes to show that this may well be an improvement on 3rd and 4th editions (not a high bar to clear IMO) but it's still an edition that reeks of player entitlement and training wheels. Putting some cute references to Old School modules on the title page doesn't make change that fact.
ReplyDeleteI'm afraid to even ask how this edition handles energy drain...
In defense of 5E, the disintigration spell will kill almost anyone else in one shot except for the fighter (and probably the other martial classes). I am inclined to agree that the old 2E approach was both more accurate to the spell intent and simpler to adjudicate. As for energy drain, we haven't got anything that showcases that (yet) for the final game, so time will tell.
DeleteI don't really think this edition supports player entitlement....at least not in the way I think of the term (4E definitely did that, imo). Rather, it is approaching the problem that happens when you try to simplify damage types too much to make everything work off of the hit point dynamic. By doing that, you lose effects like disintigrate which really should be an all-or-none effect...you're either hit and bye bye or you dodge and live another day, for example. For my purposes I'm just as worried about petrification effects, which are my bugaboo. On the plus side the 5E ghoul deals straight paralysis on a strike (with a save), something that was absent in 4E, which irritated me to no end.