I was
reading about some of the developments and rumors on the forthcoming Star Wars
Episode VII recently, and last night sat down to watch a bit of Return of the
Jedi with my son. He’s too young to fully be into Star Wars right now….but he
does have a toy lightsaber, and I thought it would be fun to let him see where
it comes from (and so now at 23 months he knows the word
“lightsaber” as well).
Incidentally
when you’re two, and obsessed with airplanes, cars and robots everything falls
into one of those three categories; so tie fighters? Airplanes. Sand crawler?
Car. R2D2 and C3P0? Robots! One out of three isn’t bad.
So while
watching Return of the Jedi with my son I realized that, from all I’ve read,
the next movie isn’t going to assume any of the continuity of the Expanded
Universe (EU) has happened….or at least, if it does make any assumptions about
the EU it may be to borrow broad concepts or specific characters (if there’s a
Thrawn or Mara Jade in Episode VII it will be pure fan service, for example).
Not taking the EU into account also means that certain “fridge logic retcon
moments” (look up fridge logic on TV Tropes) that have become so typical for
the last few decades are no longer necessarily valid.
What are
these retcon moments? Glad you asked! There are a few obvious bits in the
original trilogy that for whatever reason people couldn’t just take at face
value….and as a result, the ever expanding content of EU material through game
and fiction has made consistent fundamental assumptions about the why’s and
how’s of the Star Wars universe in such a fashion that the original movies lose some of their original specialness because of the retconing nitpickery.
Examples?
Why yes I do have a few! In each of the following cases I present this week we have an ordinary
event, character or scene in which something innocuous in the movie that could
at best be explained away as “it made for a good moment “ and on its own merits
needed no real alteration, was instead the springboard for an elaborate and lingering retcon. Each of these are fairly notable, and by no means
inclusive….but they do reflect ones I've always thought were handled
rather….oddly….in the EU canon. Here goes:
Leia Really Did Strangle Jabba With Her Own
Muscle Power
The Scene: In RotJ Leia strangles Jabba with her own slave chains. It's a nice "poetic justice" scene and allowed Leia a little payback for Jabba's nasty BDSM xenophilia.
I forget the exact way this one turned into a retcon, but I seem to recall it started with Timothy Zahn concluding that Jabba’s flabby neck was too thick and stubborn to be properly strangled by Leia on the Slave Barge. The solution? She was using latent force powers to enhance her strength! Problem apparently solved.
I forget the exact way this one turned into a retcon, but I seem to recall it started with Timothy Zahn concluding that Jabba’s flabby neck was too thick and stubborn to be properly strangled by Leia on the Slave Barge. The solution? She was using latent force powers to enhance her strength! Problem apparently solved.
This is
actually a writer’s equivalent to Occam’s Razor. Apparently it is predicated on
the assumption that:
1.
Leia is not strong enough (even though she’s
probably about 24 years old in the scene and in very good physical shape) to
pull the chain sufficiently tight to cut off Jabba’s flow of oxygen
2.
Jabba is assumed to have some sort of physiology
that is not susceptible to the sort of strangling he experiences, nor is it assumed that his
health is dubious enough to make the job easier (despite the fact that Jabba seems positively sickly in his scenes)
So what
happened was EU authors worked out a retcon implying that Leia used magic to do
it. Mhmm.
What makes
more sense? Well, let’s start with an easy premise, that what was on screen was
all it took. Leia was strong enough, and Jabba unhealthy enough that the job
was fairly easy. She didn’t even need to kill him….all he needed was to pass
out, after all; the exploding barge took care of the rest! Thus….no need for
the force to enhance Leia’s musculature despite a lack of training or
understanding.
This gets
rid of a big bugaboo I’ve always had with the various Star Wars retcons: that
Leia was too delicate a woman to do the job of polishing off Jabba.
I'll present another one of these "non-rectons" each day this week.....
Interesting. I just kind of watch the movies and only occasionally play the RPG.
ReplyDeleteI introduced the Star Wars films to my eldest daughter when she was about 26 months old. She didn't take to them as much as a Disney princess movie, but still enjoyed them. She kept asking where a certain character was when they weren't on screen, which was kind of funny. "Where's Chewbacca?"
I'll probably play them again for her when she's 3 (in about 4 months).
My son gets utterly transfixed watching it, at least until too much talking goes on (so the prequels are out) but he gets very excited at all the tech. But he's only just 2 (well, will be in a few weeks) so I expect his interest will expand a lot. Heck...he's fretting about the plight of the characters in "James and the Giant Peach" right now, and that one has him mesmerized....so who knows, his tastes may run different than ol' dad's!
Delete